It’s midnight. Some combination of insomnia, restlessness, or nocturnalism has kept you in front of your television watching reruns or, worse, the news. As a commercial break ensues, the solemn soprano of Sarah McLachlan or a cheap imitator adorns your speakers, but before you can enjoy the vibrant vocals, you are accosted with images of a malnourished child or an abused puppy. After a years-long minute of this poverty porn, your only reprieve comes in the form of a grown-up child-actor reminding you who they are—Is that what they look like now??—and telling you the good news:
“For just $2 a day, you can save this child/puppy from its terrible fate. WILL YOU HELP US?”
We’ve become largely immune to these types of guilt-inducing, exploitative pitches, and this is for the better. But should we be resistant to all pitches that suggest small amounts of money could solve big problems?
To read more, go here.